As readers of this space may remember, I have taken several media outlets to task in the past. I hold the media to very high standards and expect writers and editors to have very thick skins. I also expect them to always get the facts straight. It was in this context that I wrote to the Boston Globe’s Managing Editor for News Christine Chinlund last week.
Ms. Chinlund,
As I read the very
disturbing Page 1 story by Matt Viser today,
I was taken up short
by the statement that "The First Congressional District (of Kansas) covers
more area than any other House district in the country. It is nearly 60,000
square miles, about the size of the entire state of Illinois."
I think this
assertion would come as a big surprise to the citizens of Alaska, Montana, and
Wyoming. Each of those states has but a single member of Congress, and each state
is larger than the state of Illinois.
As a side note, I
hope that members of the Secret Service also read Viser's piece. The quotes at
the end, which threaten the life of the President, may be protected by the
First Amendment, but should also cause all levels of law enforcement to be
vigilant.
--
Ned Daly
Well, a few days passed and I hadn’t
heard from The Globe, so I wrote again.
Ms. Chinlund,
I wrote last week to
bring to your attention what I believe to be an error in Mat Viser's story on
politics in Kansas. I have not heard or seen any correction.
Does The Globe expect
its readers to believe that there are more Members of Congress than there are
Congressional Districts?
In short order I received
the following email from Ms. Chinlund.
Dear Ned --
The lapse is entirely
my fault, and I am on the case now. Sorry about that.
Best,
Chris
I was quite pleased by this and even
more pleased to see the correction in the April 9 edition of The Globe.
For the record
“* Correction: Because of an editing
error, a Page One story in Thursday’s paper about a conservative Kansas
congressional district incorrectly stated its relative geographic size. The
First Congressional District in Kansas is among the largest by territory in the
country.”
Now that is a little more like it.
Not the abject boot licking I was dreaming about, or a mention of which
gimlet-eyed reader raised the issue, but a straightforward acknowledgement that
they got the facts wrong. Over the past few years the Globe has issued printed
corrections a number of times when I have pointed out errors. This is only one
of the things I love about that paper. So I wrote-
Chris
Thanks for the
correction. One of the reasons I read the story so closely is that I have been
to that part of Kansas and hold great affection for the people there who saved
my life after a heart attack suffered on a business trip 15 years ago.
Best always,
Ned
This letter got the
following response almost immediately
Never be afraid to
nudge me. In this case, I simply lost track of the correction in the flurry of
other stuff. Not a good excuse, but the truth.
Chris
The Boston Globe should
win awards for customer service. No one at an equivalent level of any other
company I know would take the time to correspond with someone who buys less
than $1,000 worth of product a year.
Nice to be on a first
name basis with these folks too.
No comments:
Post a Comment